Thursday, June 24, 2010
DEFENDANT (1)'S MOTION TO QUASH THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR UNDER SEAL. AS TO DEFENDANT (1) [Pursuant to 18 USC § 3771]
Case 2:08-cr-20105-CM-JPO Document 107
Filed 06/23/10 Page 1 of 3
Carrie Neighbors
Defendant [1J I Pro Se Litigant
1104 Andover Lawrence. Kansas 66049 (785) 842-2785
:. ~1. t
~.
n ::
.~'
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNTIED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff,
v. Case No: 07·20073-CM 07-20124-CM OS-2010S-CM
CARRIE NEIGHBORS,
Defendant 1,
GUY M. NEIGHBORS
Defendant 2,
DEFENDANT (1)'S MOTION TO QUASH THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR UNDER SEAL. AS TO DEFENDANT (1)
[Pursuant to 18 USC § 3771]
COMES NOW on this 23 th day of June 2010, the Defendant [1], Carrie Neighbors, acting
as a pro se litigant is filing a Motion to Quash the Plaintiffs Motion for Under Seal as to Defendant [1], filed on 06/22/2010, pursuant to 18 USC§ 3771. The Motion is as follows: 1). This motion is a kitchen sink motion, in which fails to specifically identify why this Motion for under seal is needed, at this point and time. Whereby, it should be quashed. 2). The Defendant [1] has a right pursuant to18 USC § 3771 not to be excluded from any court proceeding, as well as, the right from unreasonable delay, in which is not so in this matter.
Motion to Quash the Motion for Under Seal as to Carrie Neighbors
Page 1
Case 2:08-cr-20105-CM-JPO Document 107
Filed 06/23/10 Page 2 of 3
3). Pursuant to President Obama's Memorandum on Transparency, this case should not be allowed to be placed under seal, due to the public has a right to know after the government had spent all the taxpayers monies on attempting to prosecute a case way beyond the statute of time limitations. Now, that the Defendant [1] had raised the proper motions and the government has failed within due diligence, to prosecute in a timely manner. the government now wants to conceal from the public the errors they have committed within this case. 4). This case was not concealed against the Defendant when the government had publicized this case on 12117/2009, even after the court ordered it not to be publicized, whereby stating it in layman's terms when it only benefits the Plaintiff, or government in this matter. Whereby, this now violates the rights of the accused to either defend or challenge the evidence or witnesses against her in a criminal prosecution, now that she is her own attorney. This is holding her to a heightened standard, as well as, confirms that she is denied equal access to justice. This is absurd at this point and time.
THEREFORE the Defendant [1], Carrie Neighbors, acting as a pro se litigant is filing a Motion to Quash the Plaintiffs Motion for Under Seal as to Defendant [1], filed on 06/22/2010, pursuant to 18 USC§ 3771, and PRAYS the Court Quash the Plaintiffs Motion to place this matter under seal as to Defendant [1] for the above referenced merits. Respectfully submitted.
/J
Carrie Neigh 0 Defendant [1 I Pro Se Litigant
1104 Andover Lawrence, Kansas 66049 (785) 842-2785
Motion to Quash the Motion for Under Seal as to Carrie Neighbors
Page 2
Case 2:08-cr-20105-CM-JPO Document 107
Filed 06/23/10 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
[Pursuant to KSA 60-205] The undersigned also hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing docwnent in the above captioned matter was deposited in the United States mail, fIrSt class postage prepaid, addressed to: Cheryl A Pilate Melanie Morgan LLC
Defendant [2J counsel ofrecord
142 Cherry Olathe, Kansas 66061
Marietta Parker Terra Morehead U.S. Attorneys 500 State Ave. Suite 360 Kansas City, KS 66101 On this 23 rd day of June 2010. Respectfully submitted,
cQ[;;;J
Defendant [IJ I Pro Se Litigant
1104 Andover Lawrence, Kansas 66049 (785) 842-2785
Motion to Quash the Motion for Under Seal as to Carrie Neighbors
Page 3
Friday, May 22, 2009
Guy Neighbors (owner of the yellow house store ) Bond Revoked !

Guy Neighbors's had his bond revoked this week due to an email he sent out to the FBI office in which he complained about lack of oversight in his case, which has been going on for 5 years now. Earlier Lawrence police complained about how Guy neighbors Blogs have caused them stress yet the same police continue to blog on the famous lawrence journal world website located here. http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2009/may/21/federal-magistrate-orders-yellow-house-owner-custo/
Interestingly enough they are quick to start blogging them selves after they claimed in a 275 page testimony that blogging was causing them undue stress. testimony located below:http://www.scribd.com/doc/14597829/Transcript-of-Hearing-Testimony-Case-072012401-marietta-parker-US-attorney-Yellow-house-store-owners
The Prosecutor outlined as the reasons for Guys bond to be revoked as the following:
I had a chance to look this document over. It is all Lies I have in bold the parts from the document and a response below it.
: (4) The threat of continued criminal defamation of Government counsel and witnesses if defendant were released poses a serious risk of danger to the community.
WHAT!?..... what danger does he pose to the community. He was never a danger to the community. None of his charges included killing some one or attacking someone. He is a danger to the corrupt police community, I will admit that.
: The pretrial services report indicates defendant has a significant prior criminal record (although not as significant in many federal felony cases).
I do believe the only criminal record Guy has on his record, Or at least the only one I could find was back in 1977 when he was pulled over for driving with Expired tags and that was over 30 years ago. Criminal records are matter of public record, why would they make a lie like that so blatant do they now know you can verify this information ?
: The pretrial services report submitted in connection with earlier detention hearings indicates defendant has a history relating to drug abuse.
.........False....
Guy neighbors has NO DRUG ABUSE HISTORY. pull up Guy's record there are no past arrests for drug violations.....Zero......
I wonder why they would say this ?
: (2) The record presented during earlier detention hearings indicates the Government has a fairly strong case against defendant.
This must be the reason why the gov't dropped the charges after the first 2 years. Or it could be the reason why guy has not been given a trial over the last 4 and 1/2 years..... because the gov'ts case is soooooo strong. Or maybe its because the last 5 hearings have been about the blogs and not the charges, If the case is so strong then the prosecutor should have no problem with someone claiming they are innocent and proving they are guilty.
: (1) Nature and circumstances of the offenses charged in the present case:
Conspiracy to commit wire fraud; wire fraud; and money laundering.
what happened to the rest of the charges ? I count 3 and this was supposed to be a 19 count situation.
: Alternatively, by clear and convincing evidence, the court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person or the
community. Specifically, the court finds that defendant poses a serious risk of
ongoing criminal defamation of Government counsel and witnesses.
I never would have guessed an email can be so dangerous to the community. Everyone should stop emailing immediately !
One of my concerns is this. If all of the above statements were true then why did it take 6 attempts to revoke guys bond and in those 6 attempts there was no mention of any of the above issues.
Here is a link to the rest of the court documents which the prosecutor is angry that they are made public.
http://www.scribd.com/people/documents/4230317-jones-walker
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Court transcripts on the neighbors case
here is a link to the transcripts.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/14597829/Transcript-of-Hearing-Testimony-Case-number-072012401-marietta-parker-US-attorney-
Here is the latest in bond revoke requests.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/14697585/Motion-Revoke-guy-neighbors-bond-attempt-8-by-Terra-d-morehead-and-marietta-parker-42709
Here is the motion filed by Guy's attorney this motion was to show that the prosecutor put abnormal restrictions on the viewing of evidence and was making it imposable to defend guy neighbors.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/14701513/Cheryl-Motion-to-Withdraw-from-the-Yellow-house-case
http://www.scribd.com/doc/15121192/Marietta-Parker-case-no-072012402JPO-Guy-and-carrie-Neighbors-Motion-to-revoke-bond-Mental-evaluation-Cause-hearing-
Sunday, December 28, 2008
News clipping for the yellow house store lawrence kansas
Remember the Reason they are in federal court is they were originally investigated by the IRS and the US postal service 4 years ago When those 2 agencies discovered the neighbors were doing nothing wrong they backed out of the case. The Lawrence police department now had to save face because they thought they had uncovered the largest fencing operation Lawrence Has ever seen, but in fact had the whole thing was a witch hunt. I can promise you the LPD has spent upwards in the hundreds of thousands of dollars investigating the yellow house store to only find out they haven't been breaking the law. I am going to reference the last 15 stories done by the ljworld
IF the Yellow house is committing such crimes why do the charges keep getting dropped and why has there been no trial or even a trial date set in the last 4 years. I will repeat this they have been awaiting trial for 4 years, IF the federal prosecutor had such a strong case that they were doing illegal activities why wait 4 years and still not have a trial date set
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2007/nov…
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2007/may…
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2005/dec…
http://www2.ljworld.com/photos/2006/j…
http://www2.ljworld.com/photos/2006/j…
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/jul…
http://www2.ljworld.com/blogs/lawrenc…
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/aug…
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2007/jun…
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/jul…
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/aug…
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2007/jun…
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/jun…
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/jun…
Carrie Neighbors and the yellow hosue investigation
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/nov/11/longtime_former_ku_employee_accused_stealing_unive/
Monday, December 22, 2008
we need somebody to investigate the federal prosecutors in our case for vindictive prosecution, falsifying documents, perjury, impersonating a FBI inv
P.S. guy and carrie neighbors have filed 9-motions in guy and carrie neighbors case because the prosecutor intimidated all of guy and carrie neighbors attorneys, several motions were for vindictive prosecution and one big motion for a change of venue and or to have the prosecutor rescued from guy and carrie neighbors case due to a direct conflict of interest because Parker is now the acting district attorney for the district of Kansas and she is the boss over 125 attorneys. Anyone can log on to the DOJ pacer web site and read guy and carrie neighbors motions they are very interesting and list complaints as exhibits from other people who claim the prosecutor is doing the same illegal acts to them, guy and carrie neighbors added the 3 other peoples complaints to show a pattern of abuse on the prosecutors part.
Sending guy and carrie neighbors to federal prison for 12 days was the prosecutors attempt to intimidate guy and carrie neighbors into taking her stupid plea deal guy and carrie neighbors refused several times because guy and carrie neighbors are not guilty.
Mr. Samples have been charged in State court for the stolen laptop he sold to the yellow house business so will this mean the business owners were unlawfully arrested and hauled off to federal prison for retaliation for standing up for their civil rights?